Last week we noted ATT’s whining about a $1 billion [non-cash] charge they were being forced to take because of Obamacare. In fact the new law just eliminated a 7-year old scam allowing them to ‘double-dip’ by taking a tax deduction on healthcare premiums that were actually being paid (for them) by the government.
A simple back-of-the-envelope calculation showed us ATT had saved so much money over the past 7 years, that the new $1 billion charge still left them with a $1.6 billion profit. Not a bad return on a smallish lobbying investment.
But now we learn that by their own standards of what is material information ATT shouldn’t even have brought the matter to anyone’s attention in the first place.
Turns out that ATT has been mum (F2U Rio Linda, that means ‘silent’) about another significant liability making that $1 billion write-off look like chump change.
AT&T Inc. is seeking to dismiss a long-running pension case alleging age discrimination that seeks $2.3 billion in damages, according to documents filed this week in a federal court. The suit alleges a 1998 pension change effectively froze the pensions of 40,000 older management employees at AT&T, in some cases for years, but not those of younger employees … Legal papers filed Monday… include the first publicly disclosed estimate for potential damages. The $2.3 billion potential claim dwarfs the well-publicized $1 billion noncash charge the company will take to reflect the recent loss of its deductions for health-care subsidies it receives from the government.
But because this case includes an age-discrimination claim, under federal law the judge could send it to a jury trial. If a jury found that the company willfully discriminated against older workers, it could award punitive damages that would double the size of the claim to $4.6 billion.
So how is it, you might ask, that ATT neglected to tell their shareholders about this potential damage to their share price?
Last May, the Securities and Exchange Commission asked AT&T why it hadn’t disclosed its potential exposure in the pension case. AT&T responded that it didn’t think the case met the reporting threshold for disclosure, SEC filings show.
I guess the SEC will need to re-write their regulations so that we take into account politics when deciding what is and is not material.
But wait, it gets even better.
To butress their case ATT revealed that even if they lost a $2.3 billion cash judgement it would have no real impact because the retirement account is so well-funded it could simply absorb that hit. At the same time we are being told that the Obamacare $1 billion non-cash write-off could trigger a loss of such magnitude that ATT might have to cancel or cut back retiree health benefits.
This simply boggles the mind. Or maybe not.
I must share this one via Facebook.
I am so in love with my iPhone, but articles/postings like this make me feel like I’m married to the mob.
If it makes you feel any better, just think of them as your ‘crazy uncle’.
Bob, undoubtedly you expect me to take the side of the corporate giant ATT. Two things: First those thieves take too much of my money every month to elicit sympathy from me and second I think the Obama administration is in bed with ATT, General Electric and many other corporate giants. On the one hand the administration denigrates these corporations while at the same time taking their money and working to promote policies and laws which not only enrich the Democrat’s Wall Street friends but screw the American public at the same time — it’s a two’fr!
Sharpen the pitch fork.
It pains me to say this but I agree with you; the only thing I will add is that the Repubs play the same game. We can make lists and try to figure out who is more hypocritical, but it’s a toss-up.